Ararat M. Hakobyan
Author Archives: Admin
THE FIVE NARRATIVE CODES OF ROLAND BARTHES IN HERMAN MELVILLE’S “BARTLEBY, THE SCRIVENER” – 2023-2
And its Armenian translation
Gohar K. Grigoryan
THE VOICE OF THE MAJORITY OR PEOPLE’S INFALLIBILITY THESIS – 2023-2
According to fairy tale “Anahit” by Gh. Aghayan
Sergey A. Aghajanyan
THE ARMENIAN QUESTION AT THE LAUSAN CONFERENCE – 2023-2
To the 100th anniversary of the signing of the Treaty of Lausanne on July 24, 1923
Armen Ts. Marukyan
MODERN ARMENIAN KHACHKAR CULTURE AND THE VANDALISM OF AZERBAIJAN – 2023-2
Anush A. Safaryan
The cross and the khachkar have been and remain one of the most important symbols of the Armenian identity, undergoing iconographic, thematic and content changes during their centuries-old existence. Azerbaijan’s official policy, in the way of creating its own identity, which was carried out at the expense of the Armenian identity and against that identity, often resorted to
the appropriation (Albanisation, Udiization) of the cross and the khachkar and finally its destruction. After the first Artsakh war, the khachkar, having undergone corresponding dimensional and iconographic changes, became the main symbol of the liberated territories, settlements and especially the borders.
THE SONORANTS ཇ (Y) AND པ (W) OF THE ANCIENT ARMENIAN AND LATIN (COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS) – 2023-2
THE OLD ARMENIAN DIPHTHONGS (diachronic analysis) – 2023-2
HAKOB PARONYAN’S WORKS WRITTEN IN TURKISH LANGUAGE BY ARMENIAN LETTERS – 2023-2
AR FEDERATION (DASHNAKTSUTYUN) IN THE POLITICAL SYSTEMS OF THE WESTERN ASIAN AND EASTERN EUROPEAN COUNTRIES AT THE END OF THE 19TH CENTURY AND AT THE BEGINNING OF THE 20TH CENTURY – 2023-2
Part three: The AR Federations’ connections and relationships with the Russian opposition and revolutionary parties on the eve of the First Russian Revolution (1901-1904)
Gevorg S. Khoudinyan
The article reveals that the tsarist regime in Russia, through its branched agency network, as a result of its persistent and consistent policy of governing oppressed peoples, exploited classes, and parties with radical sentiments, already on the eve of the first Russian Revolution, became a hostage of its own agency network, since its greatest dreg – Azefism – was the embryonic stem of its future revolutionary dictatorship.