Author Archives: Admin

Economy-THE EXPERIENCE OF GLOBAL CRISES AND ARMENIA – 2009-1

Summary

Atom Sh. Margaryan
Based upon the experience of global financial and economic crises, this article examines the issues surrounding the development of the Republic of Armenia’s current financial system. The concept of the modern study of crises is touched upon, in particular, the character of financial crises are discussed, the reason for their emergence, the different stages, and to overcome these, scientific and theoretical issues. Accordingly, a crisis is viewed as one of the stages in the natural development of the national economic cycle.

By classifying crises, cyclical, structural and coordinated crises are identified and studied. The rise and expansion of Kondratiev waves are discussed. Within the context of observing economic crises, the peculiarities of the manifestation of global financial crises and their influence on the economy of the Republic of Armenia are discussed.

Accordingly, the hypothetical assertion is put forward, that during a global economic crisis, those countries in transition or developing countries are affected more severely, because crises
have a cyclical characteristic; added to these are structural, coordinated and institutional crises.

As a result of studying the economic situation in the Republic of Armenia, recommendations are made based upon the conclusions and generalities, the application of which will provide the ability to overcome the crisis or to soften its blow.

These apply not only to political and institutional structures, but also to fiscal and monetary-credit policies.

AGAINST AZERBAIJANI FALSIFIERS OF THE HISTORY OF THE EASTERN TRANSCAUCASUS – 2009-1

Gevorg S. Stepanyan
Literary, lithographic and documentary sources witness that the Armenian population had been living in Eastern Ciscacausus since antiquity and that that territory was considered to be within the sphere of the influence of Armenian civilization. With the efforts of the Caucasian Tatars, heirs of the Turk-Oghuz, and the Turkish army who came to their aid, contemporary historians of the Azerbaijani state, which had been created only in 1918, over the last several decades, when reflecting upon the history of the left bank of the Kur River of “Bun Aghvank” and Shirvan, have “created” the ancient and medieval history, which has nothing to do with reality; a fable of an Aghvan-Azerbaijani-Turkish heritage.

Azerbaijani historiography has thoroughly distorted the roots of the ethnic formation of its own people – with the “excuse” of finding “Azerbaijanis,” “Azerbaijani tribes,” or the “Azerbaijani race” they have appropriated the ethnic-cultural and political history of the Eastern Cisscaucasus peoples – the Armenians, the Lezgis, the Tatars and others.

The objective of this artificial notion, is to appropriate the created spiritual and material culture of the indigenous people of the territory and by doing so present themselves as an ancient people.

MEETINGS OF THE GREATS, Hovhannes Toumanyan and Komitas – 2009-1

Summary

Susanna G. Hovhannisyan
Toumanyan and Komitas met for the first time in Etchmiadzin in the summer of 1904. They became good and dear friends. It is common knowledge that Toumanyan was the only person Komitas met in April, 1905, in Tiflis before his concerts.

Komitas loved Toumanyan and recognized Toumanyan as an artist after he became acquainted with his collection of poetry entitled Poems that had been published in Moscow in 1890. No doubt the composer, who was opening a new era in Armenian national music, was enthusiastic to read the works of the poet who had the same role in national literary history. Komitas was proud of Toumanyan, who was a national treasure and who, he was sure, would elevate the Armenian nation. Komitas would visit Toumanyan every time he went to Tiflis.

As Komitas’ fame intensified, the more envious and malicious were the attacks by some colleagues within Etchmiadzin toward him. After the death of Khrimian Hayrik, Komitas was subjected to further oppression when Archbishop Gevorg Surenyants reduced his salary 10 times.

Toumanyan’s love for Komitas’ music was as deep as Komitas’ admiration of Toumanyan’s works.
Toumanyan especially loved Komitas’ “Mikac Mirza” and “Ter Ketso.” Both men were interested in the aesthetic upbringing of children. It is no coincidence that both of them cooperated with the magazine Hasker.

Komitas, at 40 years of age, was an internationally renowned musician when he received his first piano, a gift by a wealthy benefactor, Alexander Mantashyan. That piano was a consolation and salvation to the musician, so desperate and disappointed by his life and by the people around him. The piano provided him the opportunity to continue working and developing national songs, especially the Holy Liturgy.

Komitas is also famous for his attempt at writing the opera “Anoush.” Today, the beginning of Komitas’version of “Bardz Sarer” is preserved including an extract from the “Kokhi” scene written in Armenian notes; “Ampi Takits;” “Ai Pagh Jrer;” “Aghji Anastvats;” “Asum En Urin;” “Ai Toukh Mazavor Aghjik;” “Aghji Bakhtavor;” Siroun Aghjik, Inch Es Lalis?” “Ver Kats, Ver Igit!” Berum En, Hren” and other parts. While Toumanyan took on the responsibility of writing the lines, Komitas took on the lion’s share and thoroughly composed his creative thoughts. Perhaps upon Toumanyan’s request or maybe in accordance with his own desire, Komitas kept the content of the poem intact and preserved all the characters. The only reason for not finishing the opera was because both men were busy. The poet couldn’t find the time to work on it while the composer was ready to postpone all his work to adjust to Toumanyan’s very busy schedule. Later, political persecution and pressure against Toumanyan increased and by the end of the year, the poet had been imprisoned.

We can affirm with confidence, that had it not been for Toumanyan’s cruel sufferings and Komitas’ mental deterioration, the opera would have been completed.

These two “brothers in spirit” are the cornerstones of Armenian culture, the very root of Armenian music and literature, therefore their friendship and personal intimacy was quite natural.

ARAM MANUKYAN – 2009-1

On the occasion of the 130th anniversary of his birth and 90th anniversary of his death

Armen S. Asryan
It is impossible to imagine the re-establishment of the independent statehood of the Armenians, the formation of the first Republic of Armenia without remembering and appraising the life and work of Aram Manukyan (1879-1919).

Aram Manukyan was devoted to the Armenian people, to the struggle for the re-establishment of its independent statehood and freedom. Aram Manukyan’s every act appeared to be politically mellow and prudent; he had a gift for organizing, an unselfish behavior, unbending will, optimism and a sense of responsibility towards the destiny of his nation.

Since his membership to the Armenian Revolutionary Federation in the 1890s, Aram Manukyan fought for the freedom of Armenians till the end of his life. He believed that Armenians, who had raised the flag of liberation against the yolk of Turkish oppression, must rely on their own power.

During the First World War, Aram tried to protect the Armenians of Van from Turkish brutality. In April, 1915, by collaborating with other political forces, Aram organized the selfdefense of Van. As a result, Van was saved from the massacres, which befell 1.5 million Armenians from other regions of Western Armenia.

The ideological, practical and consistent steps taken by Aram in 1918; his decisive orientation in the fatal days of May when the battle had turned in the Turks’ favor; his defense of Yerevan that brought a nation and its forces in despair to its senses from the horrific danger of a Turkish attack, not only guaranteed the existence of the Armenians nation but re-established an independent Armenian statehood.

We are obliged to Aram Manukyan for establishing the Republic of Armenia and it isn’t fortuitous that only he has been honored with the title of founder of the Republic.

LEVON SHANT’S “ANCIENT GODS” AND WILLIAM GOLDING’S “THE SPIRE” – 2009-1

(Comparative Analysis)

Summary

Albert A. Makaryan, Haikanush A. Sharuryan
In this article, we have tried to analyze the play, Ancient Gods by well known Armenian playwright Levon Shant and the novel The Spire by famous English novelist William Golding using comparative and typological methods. We have attempted to reveal the generalities and differences of these two works.

From the comparative analysis of Levon Shant’s drama, Ancient Gods and William Golding’s novel The Spire, we have been able to clarify that the journey of the characters in both works toward God traverse through an earthly love (sin). This same issue is present in The Spire where Jocelyn has parallel relations – love, faith toward God – an attempt is made to construct it through the spire, however this also does not occur.

THE STATE PROGRAM OF THE ARMENIAN GENOCIDE – 2009-1

The comparative analysis of three Turkish documents

Ruben A. Safrastyan
The program of the Armenian genocide implemented by the government of Ottoman Turkey during the World War I has not received all the attention it deserves. Although a number of books exist concerning Armenian genocide, this is the first paper to be devoted solely to problem under discussion.

The subjects of the investigation are the following ottoman documents:

-The 10 points action plan to eliminate Armenians under cover of deportation, approved by the secret meeting of five leading members of ottoman government and army headquarter, including interior minister Talaat. This document represents the early stage of preparing the program of genocide

-Official Decision of ottoman government on the beginning the deportation of Armenian, which unmasks the genocidal intention of Turkish authorities

-The Deportation Law, which aimed to provide “the legal cover” for the criminal act of Armenian genocide

Thoughtfully examination of sources allows author to come to conclusion that above-mentioned documents formed the program of the Armenian genocide.

ARMENIA AND EUROPE – 2009-1

The history of Armenia and the Armenian culture in perspective of contemporary historical and political theories

Summary

Hamlet A. Gevorkian
The contemporary theoretical conceptions of history, politics and culture are based on the analysis and interpretation of the history of Western Europe. When applied to the Armenian history and culture, they must be specified and re-interpreted. In this paper the place and the role of Armenia and Armenian culture are considered in the historical context. The concepts synchronousand diachronous wholeness of culture are introduced and the continuityof the history of Armenia and of the Armenian culture is affirmed. The Armenian culture has expanded its potentialities in the whole cultural space in every historical epoch, and proved to be able to enter into dialogue with other cultures, to adopt and preserve historical monuments of material, social and intellectual culture. It is obvious the impact of the European culture and socal life on Armenia, the progress of the country in Europeanization, interrupted and suppressed by Genocide – massacres and deportation – of the Armenian population. Since there is not any negative prescription for the crimes against humanities, the European countries are expected to realize the Resolution of the European community Parliament (1987) on “Political solution of the Armenian question” (not mere acknowledgement of the fact of the Genocide).

ARMENIA AND ARMENIAN TOPONYMS – 2009-1

The scientific assignment of the Armenian natural historic environment’s protection

Summary

Eduard L. Danielyan
The cognition of the more than five millennia-old Armenian history is one of the roots feeding Armenian political thought and the protective aura of Armenian ethno-spirituality. The national activities in the political, spiritual-cultural, scientific-educational and ideological spheres are based on the Fatherland’s natural perception fastened by historic memory and national psychology.

After the Armenian Genocide the Turkish vandals continued genocide by the destruction of the Armenian cultural heritage – historic monuments, as well as falsifying Armenian toponyms and fabricating “new” ones in Turkish (against all moral and legal norms and canons of human behavior and international legal obligations, challenging the civilized world, they have even infringed on the biblical name of Mt.Ararat-Masis). They are aiming at erasing the truth about Western Armenia and Armenian Cilicia from historic memory. Despite the Pan-Turkic genocidal policy, some articles of certain international documents (The Severs Treaty and “The Arbitral Award on Turkish-Armenian Boundary by Woodrow Wilson, the President of the United States of America”) are devoted to Armenia (see also the map: „Boundary between Turkey and Armenia as Determined by Woodrow Wilson, President of the United States of America“).

The Turkish occupants continue to change the proper Armenian toponyms in Western Armenia. They try to disguise the truth about the Armenian Genocide – the crime against humanity and civilization, and to “appropriate” the Western Armenian lands occupied by them. The same is committed by the Azerbaijani criminal authorities.

The world-famous scientific, political and spiritual figures have spoken about the Armenian contribution to the world civilization. D.M.Lang called his book “Armenia: Cradle of Civilization”. The Armenian Nation who enriched the Armenian and the world treasuries of culture with great civilizational values is the original owner of Great Armenia, Armenia Minor and Armenian Cilicia – the Armenian Fatherland. The Armenian victory in the Artsakh war against the Azerbaijan Republic’s aggression, and, the result of the victory – the liberation of the Armenian lands in Artsakh – NKR (mountainous part) and its inseparable liberated native territories – demonstrate the will and belief of the Armenian people to liberate the rest of the Armenian Fatherland (Western Armenia, Armenian Cilicia and, in Eastern Armenia, – Nakhijevan, the rest of Artsakh and Utik, Javakhk and others).

The historic heritage’s protection is the task of the Armenian information security in which the toponyms, reflecting the characteristics of the national historic environment and identity, are of fundamental importance. The historic-geographic terminology of the Armenian Highland, constituting the entity of the Armenian toponymy, belongs to the pivotal layer of Armenian ethnic-linguistic thinking. The Armenian toponyms’ protection has ethno-protective significance and as a vital sphere of the Armenian national security must be the priority mission of the RA, NKR and the Armenian Diaspora organizations.